For universities, placement officers, and leadership
Identify At-Risk Students Before Placement Season
See exactly which students are placement-ready and close gaps before recruiters see them—one batch-wide view for leadership and advisors.
Used by early partner institutions for the 2026 placement cycle. Limited pilot spots.
It's all about speed
Pilot placement teams use ResumeGrade to standardise drafts, run JD alignment, and surface 0 to 100 readiness before students flood the market, so shortlisting odds stop being a guessing game.
Amazing people to work with. Very fast and professional partner.
- 0%
Higher shortlisting rate vs baseline batch (pilot sample)
- 0%
Faster resume review cycle vs manual line by line checks
- 0%
Lift in average ATS readiness score after first revision pass
- 0%
More students hitting "ready to apply" before drive week
Why capable students still don't get shortlisted
Placement teams are forced to rely on guesswork instead of measurable standards.
Placement teams spend hours reviewing resumes that never get shortlisted.
ATS & Screening
Most resumes fail ATS filters before reaching recruiters
Role Fit
Students apply with generic resumes instead of role-specific ones
Consistency
No standard: resume quality varies wildly across students
Scale
Placement teams can't review 1000+ resumes manually
Standardise → Align → Prove Readiness
One placement system, not a grab bag of features. Standardise quality, align to each role, then prove readiness with scores before students hit “apply.”
Standardise resume quality across all students
Shared structure, templates, and feedback loops, so every file meets the same bar and you can compare batches fairly.
Align resumes to job roles before applying
Match each resume to the JD and surface gaps early so students send role specific files, not one generic document.
Prove readiness with measurable 0 to 100 scores
Transparent rubric, line level feedback, and an action list, so screening and skimmability expectations are met before submission.
See the difference structure makes
The same candidate can look unfocused and hard to parse, or clear, scannable, and aligned with what recruiters and ATS tools expect. Slide across to compare a weak layout with a strong one.
This is what your students submit today vs after using ResumeGrade.
Drag the divider left or right to compare.
Built on Proven Resume Standards, Not Guesswork
Unlike generic tools, scoring is grounded in widely used career services guidelines (Harvard Career Services principles), combined with structured checks that mirror how employers skim and filter, so outcomes are comparable batch to batch.
The rubric
Career services structure, not a black box
Students and advisors see how the score breaks down, so feedback feels fair, teachable, and repeatable across a batch.
Transparent scoring
You see what the rubric measures. No mystery ingredients.
Structured feedback
Concrete line level notes, not vague “AI says improve this.”
Recruiter realistic bar
Concise, skimmable, impact led, aligned with how employers read.
Integrity guardrails
Rewrites never invent achievements; they only rephrase what’s there.
Everything placement teams need to manage resume quality at scale
Built for Placement Teams, Not Just Students
Everything placement leadership needs to turn prep into a managed system. Roadmap items scale with your rollout.
Dashboard for placement officers
Track student uploads, scores, and batch progress, and see who needs support early.
Batch analytics
Average scores by batch, department, or intake, and compare terms over time.
Standardisation
One quality bar across departments so advising and training stay aligned.
Bulk analysis
Review many files without opening each resume manually, at scale for large batches.
Progress tracking
Score improvement over time as students iterate before placement season.
Institutional rollout
From pilot to campus wide tiers, built for governance and procurement conversations.
Advisor & student nudges
Email style prompts when drafts stall or scores drop, without manual chasing.
Exports & reporting
CSV and summary views for leadership reviews, accreditation, and partner updates.
Turn placement preparation into a measurable, trackable system.
Improve Placement Outcomes with Data
See batch-level signals and student-level actions in one place, so leadership can steer prep before placement season peaks.
Identify which students are ready, and who needs support, instantly.
Batch scorecards
Track average scores, batch trends, and who still needs support, without opening hundreds of PDFs by hand.
Average readiness score
Rolling batch view: compare departments or intakes at a glance.
JD alignment coverage
Share of students who matched a target role before applying.
From score to action
Scores tie to line level feedback and a ranked action list, so students know what to fix next, and advisors can intervene early.
Top actions
Done: Quantify impact
3 bullets flagged
Batch trends
Resume quality and shortlisting readiness rise together: compare batches and terms on one view.
Scoring + JD fabric
0 to 100 rubric, line feedback, and JD match live in one workflow, with no brittle handoffs between tools.
Human-in-the-loop
Advisors add reviews and nudges where it matters, without rereading every draft line by line.
Students who follow structured resume systems and role-specific tailoring are typically better positioned to pass first round screening. The exact lift depends on your batch and labour market.
Frequently asked questions
Ready to improve your placement outcomes?
Book a walkthrough or start a pilot. We'll align to your academic calendar.